Had it been one of my own friends, I would probably have taken her down in a tackle and punched her on the nose a couple of times, but this was a friend of a friend, and I didn’t want to engage in a fight on someone else’s wall. And I am glad I stopped to take a breath before reacting, because when I thought about it, I realized she was right.
Girls’ Education is NOT a magic pill that you can force down the throat of an unwilling society, and expect it to cure centuries of oppression and neglect. Education alone does not make any difference to the status of women in either the household or the community. Education does not necessarily lead to financial independence, and financial independence does not imply social justice.
Though it pains me to say so, educating girls and women is
not ‘The Solution’.
Let us for a moment forget the female foetuses that are killed
in the womb, the female babies that are abandoned soon after birth, and the girls
that are allowed to die due to malnutrition and neglect. Let us think only of
the girls who are lucky enough to be allowed to reach their fifth birthdays.
Let us think about Arthi who is grudgingly allowed to go to the local government school, provided she milks the goats first thing in the morning, and fetches water from a well 5 miles away after she gets back home from school. While her male classmates are playing cricket, she’s busy helping her mother cook dinner, and long after everyone retires for the night, she tries to finish her homework in the light of a flickering lamp. Arthi still manages to keep up with her studies, but the day her mother falls ill after delivering a male child, she is expected to drop out of school and mind her baby brother. She is seven, but her life is all but over. No more dreaming of becoming a doctor and serving humanity.
She knows that she will be kept at home to mind a succession of younger siblings, and be married off to a much older man soon after she attains puberty.
She might remember her dreams, and try to ensure her daughters get an education, but dreams are not always something you can afford when you are trying desperately to keep a family together on a meagre income.
Building a school would not have made any difference to Arthi’s life, because her family decided they were better off using her as a full-time unpaid help.
Let us think about Urmila who managed to stay in school long
enough to graduate. The nearest college is in a city 100 miles away, and even
if they could afford it, her parents would not allow her to leave home for fear
of the stigma that would attach itself to a girl who lived “alone in an alien
city”. Her high school graduation certificate is of no use in helping her get a
job in her village, and she is eventually left with no choice but to allow her
family to marry her off to the first man who will have her.
Her husband grudges her the independence of thought that an education
has given her, and works hard to stamp out her spirit. To survive, she leans to
curb her tongue and accede to whatever is demanded of her. She does her best to
encourage other girls to study and dream big, and when the time comes, she will
move to the city herself so her daughter can go to college.But a high school education did not leave Urmila any better off than she would have been if she had dropped out of school after primary school.
Let us think about Sukriti who studied and became a teacher
in the local village school. She earns more than any of her brothers, but is expected
to hand over her entire earnings to her father. Few men are willing to even
consider marrying her, and her father deters the few that are because he doesn’t
want to give up on a reliable source of money. She has no say in any of the decisions
that the family makes, she is excluded from social activities because of her
unmarried status, and though she loves teaching young girls, she wonders if
this is the life she expected when she fought society to be allowed to realize
her dreams.
Sukriti is educated and has a good job, but financial
earnings have not translated into social or economic independence for her.
Building schools has not made too much of a difference to Arthi,
Urmila or Sukriti. Clearly education is NOT a magic pill. It is not a
magic-pill, because the problem is not a simple one. The status of women is
linked to poverty and to the rural-urban divide. It is the product of generations
of oppression in the household, and centuries of being denied their rightful place
in society.
When the problem is as deep rooted
in tradition and poverty as the condition of women in some parts of the world,
the solution cannot be a simple one. Society needs to accept women as useful
citizens and not merely as breeding machines; families need to move from a patriarchal
mode to a more equitable one; communities need to train themselves to hear the
voice of women. None of that can happen in a day, a month, a decade or even a
generation. Change has to be gradual. Change has to start somewhere. And Education is as good a place to start as any other. Girls who go to school learn to look beyond the constraints a patriarchal society has placed on them. They look at a future beyond the traditional "female" occupations which ultimately boil down to pleasing men in some way, and start thinking for themselves.
And that is definitely the first step towards a change which may well take more than one generation to manifest itself in.
3 comments:
It really IS so complicated, isn't? Even in the US, where theoretically, the obstacles shouldn't be there, education for minorities isn't accompanied by the same financial and status awards--in our case, it is institutional racism and discrimination (even though at least the latter is illegal). It's easy to understand how much worse it is with cultural reinforcement and poverty-created needs. And I'm with you... even if education isn't adequate, it certainly is a logical starting place.
Education is constantly under the attack in the United States and I don't think young people realize enough of how important it is.
Wow. I got goosebumps just reading this Natasha. Although I was first adamantly against your "friend's" point of view, I have to admit, there is validity in it. Here in the US, like Hart says, there is discrimination but not only against race. There is also the imbalance in our society for those in the lower socioeconomic status.
Schools that have students with higher incomes can afford the field trips, brand new textbooks and nutritious lunches. However, schools that have students from low income families get their budgets cut and must make do with what meager funds they are awarded. It's quite sad how these inequities are prevalent throughout the world.
Great post!
Post a Comment